Re: Re: Perth Group reasoning 26 March 2004
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Murali Mohan,

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Re: Perth Group reasoning

On March 26th , the Perth group wrote, " "So, would Peter Flegg please give us the scientific reasons that made him call the "Perth Group document on Nevirapine", "wretched"? "

On 17 September 2003,in the post "Re:The Perth Group "answer" to Christopher Noble" , I had expressed my concern at the uncivil language that was being used by one of the contributors. Peter Flegg has demonstrated that he is no better by calling a document "wretched". Even if he can prove that the Perth group document in question is not based on sound science , he should still not resort to using such strong terms.

Competing interests: None declared