Re: Re: Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... 25 March 2004
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Mark Bartlett,
Communicable Disease Investigator
Toronto, Canada

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Re: Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other...

Brian Foley Writes:"The authors may either be knowingly telling lies, or they may just be ignorant of how biology/virology/epidemiology is done".

Intellectual elitism at its finest. It is an old trick. Only those who have attained a particular enlightened state are capable of grasping the real truth of AIDS/HIV science -- the rest are intellectually inferior and just incapable of understanding.

There are two main problems with this reasoning.

First, many who continue to question AIDS are equally adept at the scientific method -- in fact they are enlightened. What they understand is, there are still too many unanswered questions and inconsistancies to give credence to the HIV = AIDS theory.

Second, the predictions made by many of the mainstream "experts" have proven to be so completley wrong, it would be irresponsible NOT to question.

The fact of the matter is, many of the epidemiological predictions made by the so-called dissidents, have been far more accurate than those made by the so-called mainstream.

Competing interests: None declared